In the excerpts from this section of Laudato Si', Francis discusses various aspects of proper educational environmental education. He calls for scientific understanding, but also more than that: the cultivation of simple living, a generous spirit, an appreciation of beauty, and a willingness to sacrifice. These are the things needed to overcome faulty paradigms. And, as Francis points out, they begin in the family.
II. EDUCATING FOR THE COVENANT BETWEEN HUMANITY AND THE ENVIRONMENT
209. An awareness of the gravity of today's cultural and ecological crisis must be translated into new habits. Many people know that our current progress and the mere amassing of things and pleasures are not enough to give meaning and joy to the human heart, yet they feel unable to give up what the market sets before them. In those countries which should be making the greatest changes in consumer habits, young people have a new ecological sensitivity and a generous spirit, and some of them are making admirable efforts to protect the environment. At the same time, they have grown up in a milieu of extreme consumerism and affluence which makes it difficult to develop other habits. We are faced with an educational challenge.
210. Environmental education has broadened its goals. Whereas in the beginning it was mainly centred on scientific information, consciousness-raising and the prevention of environmental risks, it tends now to include a critique of the "myths" of a modernity grounded in a utilitarian mindset (individualism, unlimited progress, competition, consumerism, the unregulated market). It seeks also to restore the various levels of ecological equilibrium, establishing harmony within ourselves, with others, with nature and other living creatures, and with God. Environmental education should facilitate making the leap towards the transcendent which gives ecological ethics its deepest meaning....
211. Yet this education, aimed at creating an "ecological citizenship", is at times limited to providing information, and fails to instill good habits. The existence of laws and regulations is insufficient in the long run to curb bad conduct, even when effective means of enforcement are present.... Only by cultivating sound virtues will people be able to make a selfless ecological commitment. A person who could afford to spend and consume more but regularly uses less heating and wears warmer clothes, shows the kind of convictions and attitudes which help to protect the environment. There is a nobility in the duty to care for creation through little daily actions, and it is wonderful how education can bring about real changes in lifestyle. Education in environmental responsibility can encourage ways of acting which directly and significantly affect the world around us.... Reusing something instead of immediately discarding it, when done for the right reasons, can be an act of love which expresses our own dignity.
212. We must not think that these efforts are not going to change the world. They benefit society, often unbeknown to us, for they call forth a goodness which, albeit unseen, inevitably tends to spread....
213. Ecological education can take place in a variety of settings: at school, in families, in the media, in catechesis and elsewhere. Good education plants seeds when we are young, and these continue to bear fruit throughout life. Here, though, I would stress the great importance of the family, which is "the place in which life - the gift of God - can be properly welcomed and protected against the many attacks to which it is exposed, and can develop in accordance with what constitutes authentic human growth. In the face of the so-called culture of death, the family is the heart of the culture of life".[149]... In the family we receive an integral education, which enables us to grow harmoniously in personal maturity. In the family we learn to ask without demanding, to say "thank you" as an expression of genuine gratitude for what we have been given, to control our aggressivity and greed, and to ask forgiveness when we have caused harm. These simple gestures of heartfelt courtesy help to create a culture of shared life and respect for our surroundings.
214. Political institutions and various other social groups are also entrusted with helping to raise people's awareness. So too is the Church.... It is my hope that our seminaries and houses of formation will provide an education in responsible simplicity of life, in grateful contemplation of God's world, and in concern for the needs of the poor and the protection of the environment.... We... need the personal qualities of self-control and willingness to learn from one another.
215. In this regard, "the relationship between a good aesthetic education and the maintenance of a healthy environment cannot be overlooked".[150] By learning to see and appreciate beauty, we learn to reject self-interested pragmatism. If someone has not learned to stop and admire something beautiful, we should not be surprised if he or she treats everything as an object to be used and abused without scruple....
NOTES
[149] JOHN PAUL II, Encyclical Letter Centesimus Annus (1 May 1991), 39.
[150] ID., Message for the 1990 World Day of Peace, 14.
Showing posts with label Centesimus Annus. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Centesimus Annus. Show all posts
Wednesday, November 18, 2015
Friday, October 23, 2015
"Work is a path to growth, human development and personal fulfilment": Laudato Si', 122-129
In the excerpts below, Francis links the throwaway culture of the present age to a relativist mindset which only asks, "What good is it to me?" He then segues to the topic of employment. Work, he explains, is about more than bettering our own lot; it is the means by which we develop personally and spiritually. Thus, ensuring work for everyone is as much about their personal growth as it is their financial status. Francis also references the life of Charles de Foucauld (1858-1916), who lived a life of simplicity and service among the Tuaregs of North Africa. Enjoy!
Practical relativism
122. ...When human beings place themselves at the centre, they give absolute priority to immediate convenience and all else becomes relative. Hence we should not be surprised to find, in conjunction with the omnipresent technocratic paradigm and the cult of unlimited human power, the rise of a relativism which sees everything as irrelevant unless it serves one's own immediate interests....
123. The culture of relativism is the same disorder which drives one person to take advantage of another, to treat others as mere objects, imposing forced labour on them or enslaving them to pay their debts. The same kind of thinking leads to the sexual exploitation of children and abandonment of the elderly who no longer serve our interests. It is also the mindset of those who say: Let us allow the invisible forces of the market to regulate the economy, and consider their impact on society and nature as collateral damage. In the absence of objective truths or sound principles other than the satisfaction of our own desires and immediate needs, what limits can be placed on human trafficking, organized crime, the drug trade, commerce in blood diamonds and the fur of endangered species? Is it not the same relativistic logic which justifies buying the organs of the poor for resale or use in experimentation, or eliminating children because they are not what their parents wanted? This same "use and throw away" logic generates so much waste, because of the disordered desire to consume more than what is really necessary. We should not think that political efforts or the force of law will be sufficient to prevent actions which affect the environment because, when the culture itself is corrupt and objective truth and universally valid principles are no longer upheld, then laws can only be seen as arbitrary impositions or obstacles to be avoided.
The need to protect employment
124. Any approach to an integral ecology, which by definition does not exclude human beings, needs to take account of the value of labour, as Saint John Paul II wisely noted.... God placed man and woman in the garden he had created (cf. Gen 2:15) not only to preserve it but also to make it fruitful. Labourers and craftsmen thus "maintain the fabric of the world" (Sir 38:34).... We ourselves become the instrument used by God to bring out the potential which he himself inscribed in things: "The Lord created medicines out of the earth, and a sensible man will not despise them" (Sir 38:4).
125. ...Underlying every form of work is a concept of the relationship which we can and must have with what is other than ourselves. Together with the awe-filled contemplation of creation which we find in Saint Francis of Assisi, the Christian spiritual tradition has also developed a rich and balanced understanding of the meaning of work, as, for example, in the life of Blessed Charles de Foucauld and his followers.
126. We can also look to the great tradition of monasticism. Originally, it was a kind of flight from the world, an escape from the decadence of the cities. The monks sought the desert, convinced that it was the best place for encountering the presence of God. Later, Saint Benedict of Norcia proposed that his monks live in community, combining prayer and spiritual reading with manual labour (ora et labora). Seeing manual labour as spiritually meaningful proved revolutionary. Personal growth and sanctification came to be sought in the interplay of recollection and work. This way of experiencing work makes us more protective and respectful of the environment; it imbues our relationship to the world with a healthy sobriety.
127. ...Once our human capacity for contemplation and reverence is impaired, it becomes easy for the meaning of work to be misunderstood.[101] We need to remember that men and women have "the capacity to improve their lot, to further their moral growth and to develop their spiritual endowments".[102] Work should be the setting for this rich personal growth, where many aspects of life enter into play: creativity, planning for the future, developing our talents, living out our values, relating to others, giving glory to God. It follows that... it is essential that "we continue to prioritize the goal of access to steady employment for everyone",[103] no matter the limited interests of business and dubious economic reasoning.
128. We were created with a vocation to work. The goal should not be that technological progress increasingly replace human work, for this would be detrimental to humanity. Work is a necessity, part of the meaning of life on this earth, a path to growth, human development and personal fulfilment. Helping the poor financially must always be a provisional solution in the face of pressing needs. The broader objective should always be to allow them a dignified life through work. Yet the orientation of the economy has favoured a kind of technological progress in which the costs of production are reduced by laying off workers and replacing them with machines. This is yet another way in which we can end up working against ourselves....
129. In order to continue providing employment, it is imperative to promote an economy which favours productive diversity and business creativity. For example, there is a great variety of small-scale food production systems which feed the greater part of the world's peoples, using a modest amount of land and producing less waste.... Civil authorities have the right and duty to adopt clear and firm measures in support of small producers and differentiated production. To ensure economic freedom from which all can effectively benefit, restraints occasionally have to be imposed on those possessing greater resources and financial power. To claim economic freedom while real conditions bar many people from actual access to it, and while possibilities for employment continue to shrink, is to practice a doublespeak which brings politics into disrepute....
NOTES
[101] Cf. JOHN PAUL II, Encyclical Letter Centesimus Annus (1 May 1991), 37.
[102] PAUL VI, Encyclical Letter Populorum Progressio (26 March 1967), 34.
[103] BENEDICT XVI, Encyclical Letter Caritas in Veritate (29 June 2009), 32.
Practical relativism
122. ...When human beings place themselves at the centre, they give absolute priority to immediate convenience and all else becomes relative. Hence we should not be surprised to find, in conjunction with the omnipresent technocratic paradigm and the cult of unlimited human power, the rise of a relativism which sees everything as irrelevant unless it serves one's own immediate interests....
123. The culture of relativism is the same disorder which drives one person to take advantage of another, to treat others as mere objects, imposing forced labour on them or enslaving them to pay their debts. The same kind of thinking leads to the sexual exploitation of children and abandonment of the elderly who no longer serve our interests. It is also the mindset of those who say: Let us allow the invisible forces of the market to regulate the economy, and consider their impact on society and nature as collateral damage. In the absence of objective truths or sound principles other than the satisfaction of our own desires and immediate needs, what limits can be placed on human trafficking, organized crime, the drug trade, commerce in blood diamonds and the fur of endangered species? Is it not the same relativistic logic which justifies buying the organs of the poor for resale or use in experimentation, or eliminating children because they are not what their parents wanted? This same "use and throw away" logic generates so much waste, because of the disordered desire to consume more than what is really necessary. We should not think that political efforts or the force of law will be sufficient to prevent actions which affect the environment because, when the culture itself is corrupt and objective truth and universally valid principles are no longer upheld, then laws can only be seen as arbitrary impositions or obstacles to be avoided.
The need to protect employment
124. Any approach to an integral ecology, which by definition does not exclude human beings, needs to take account of the value of labour, as Saint John Paul II wisely noted.... God placed man and woman in the garden he had created (cf. Gen 2:15) not only to preserve it but also to make it fruitful. Labourers and craftsmen thus "maintain the fabric of the world" (Sir 38:34).... We ourselves become the instrument used by God to bring out the potential which he himself inscribed in things: "The Lord created medicines out of the earth, and a sensible man will not despise them" (Sir 38:4).
125. ...Underlying every form of work is a concept of the relationship which we can and must have with what is other than ourselves. Together with the awe-filled contemplation of creation which we find in Saint Francis of Assisi, the Christian spiritual tradition has also developed a rich and balanced understanding of the meaning of work, as, for example, in the life of Blessed Charles de Foucauld and his followers.
126. We can also look to the great tradition of monasticism. Originally, it was a kind of flight from the world, an escape from the decadence of the cities. The monks sought the desert, convinced that it was the best place for encountering the presence of God. Later, Saint Benedict of Norcia proposed that his monks live in community, combining prayer and spiritual reading with manual labour (ora et labora). Seeing manual labour as spiritually meaningful proved revolutionary. Personal growth and sanctification came to be sought in the interplay of recollection and work. This way of experiencing work makes us more protective and respectful of the environment; it imbues our relationship to the world with a healthy sobriety.
127. ...Once our human capacity for contemplation and reverence is impaired, it becomes easy for the meaning of work to be misunderstood.[101] We need to remember that men and women have "the capacity to improve their lot, to further their moral growth and to develop their spiritual endowments".[102] Work should be the setting for this rich personal growth, where many aspects of life enter into play: creativity, planning for the future, developing our talents, living out our values, relating to others, giving glory to God. It follows that... it is essential that "we continue to prioritize the goal of access to steady employment for everyone",[103] no matter the limited interests of business and dubious economic reasoning.
128. We were created with a vocation to work. The goal should not be that technological progress increasingly replace human work, for this would be detrimental to humanity. Work is a necessity, part of the meaning of life on this earth, a path to growth, human development and personal fulfilment. Helping the poor financially must always be a provisional solution in the face of pressing needs. The broader objective should always be to allow them a dignified life through work. Yet the orientation of the economy has favoured a kind of technological progress in which the costs of production are reduced by laying off workers and replacing them with machines. This is yet another way in which we can end up working against ourselves....
129. In order to continue providing employment, it is imperative to promote an economy which favours productive diversity and business creativity. For example, there is a great variety of small-scale food production systems which feed the greater part of the world's peoples, using a modest amount of land and producing less waste.... Civil authorities have the right and duty to adopt clear and firm measures in support of small producers and differentiated production. To ensure economic freedom from which all can effectively benefit, restraints occasionally have to be imposed on those possessing greater resources and financial power. To claim economic freedom while real conditions bar many people from actual access to it, and while possibilities for employment continue to shrink, is to practice a doublespeak which brings politics into disrepute....
NOTES
[101] Cf. JOHN PAUL II, Encyclical Letter Centesimus Annus (1 May 1991), 37.
[102] PAUL VI, Encyclical Letter Populorum Progressio (26 March 1967), 34.
[103] BENEDICT XVI, Encyclical Letter Caritas in Veritate (29 June 2009), 32.
Monday, October 12, 2015
"All of us are linked by unseen bonds": Laudato Si', 89-95
In the excerpts that follow, Francis covers two topics: (a) the universal communion that exists (or should exist) among all creatures, including both men and the entire natural world; and (b) the Catholic understanding of private property, which must always be a form of stewardship oriented to the universal common good. Enjoy!
V. A UNIVERSAL COMMUNION
89. The created things of this world are not free of ownership: "For they are yours, O Lord..." (Wis 11:26). This is the basis of our conviction that, as part of the universe, called into being by one Father, all of us are linked by unseen bonds and together form a kind of universal family, a sublime communion which fills us with a sacred, affectionate and humble respect....
90. This is not to put all living beings on the same level nor to deprive human beings of their unique worth and the tremendous responsibility it entails. Nor does it imply a divinization of the earth which would prevent us from working on it and protecting it in its fragility.... At times we see an obsession with denying any pre-eminence to the human person; more zeal is shown in protecting other species than in defending the dignity which all human beings share in equal measure. Certainly, we should be concerned lest other living beings be treated irresponsibly. But we should be particularly indignant at the enormous inequalities in our midst.... We fail to see that some are mired in desperate and degrading poverty, with no way out, while others have not the faintest idea of what to do with their possessions, vainly showing off their supposed superiority and leaving behind them so much waste which, if it were the case everywhere, would destroy the planet. In practice, we continue to tolerate that some consider themselves more human than others, as if they had been born with greater rights.
91. A sense of deep communion with the rest of nature cannot be real if our hearts lack tenderness, compassion and concern for our fellow human beings. It is clearly inconsistent to combat trafficking in endangered species while remaining completely indifferent to human trafficking, unconcerned about the poor, or undertaking to destroy another human being deemed unwanted....
92. Moreover, when our hearts are authentically open to universal communion, this sense of fraternity excludes nothing and no one. It follows that our indifference or cruelty towards fellow creatures of this world sooner or later affects the treatment we mete out to other human beings. We have only one heart, and the same wretchedness which leads us to mistreat an animal will not be long in showing itself in our relationships with other people....
VI. THE COMMON DESTINATION OF GOODS
93. Whether believers or not, we are agreed today that the earth is essentially a shared inheritance, whose fruits are meant to benefit everyone. For believers, this becomes a question of fidelity to the Creator, since God created the world for everyone.... The principle of the subordination of private property to the universal destination of goods, and thus the right of everyone to their use, is a golden rule of social conduct and "the first principle of the whole ethical and social order".[71] The Christian tradition has never recognized the right to private property as absolute or inviolable, and has stressed the social purpose of all forms of private property. Saint John Paul II forcefully reaffirmed this teaching, stating that "God gave the earth to the whole human race for the sustenance of all its members, without excluding or favouring anyone".[72] These are strong words. He noted that "a type of development which did not respect and promote human rights - personal and social, economic and political, including the rights of nations and of peoples - would not be really worthy of man".[73]...
94. The rich and the poor have equal dignity, for "the Lord is the maker of them all" (Prov 22:2).... This has practical consequences, such as those pointed out by the bishops of Paraguay: "Every campesino has a natural right to possess a reasonable allotment of land where he can establish his home, work for subsistence of his family and a secure life. This right must be guaranteed so that its exercise is not illusory but real. That means that apart from the ownership of property, rural people must have access to means of technical education, credit, insurance, and markets".[77]
95. ...If we make something our own, it is only to administer it for the good of all. If we do not, we burden our consciences with the weight of having denied the existence of others. That is why the New Zealand bishops asked what the commandment "Thou shall not kill" means when "twenty percent of the world's population consumes resources at a rate that robs the poor nations and future generations of what they need to survive".[78]
NOTES
[71] JOHN PAUL II, Encyclical Letter Laborem Exercens (14 September 1981), 19.
[72] Encyclical Letter Centesimus Annus (1 May 1991), 31.
[73] Encyclical Letter Sollicitudo Rei Socialis (30 December 1987), 33.
[77] PARAGUAYAN BISHOPS' CONFERENCE, Pastoral Letter El campesino paraguayo y la tierra (12 June 1983), 2, 4, d.
[78] NEW ZEALAND CATHOLIC BISHOPS CONFERENCE, Statement on Environmental Issues (1 September 2006).
V. A UNIVERSAL COMMUNION
89. The created things of this world are not free of ownership: "For they are yours, O Lord..." (Wis 11:26). This is the basis of our conviction that, as part of the universe, called into being by one Father, all of us are linked by unseen bonds and together form a kind of universal family, a sublime communion which fills us with a sacred, affectionate and humble respect....
90. This is not to put all living beings on the same level nor to deprive human beings of their unique worth and the tremendous responsibility it entails. Nor does it imply a divinization of the earth which would prevent us from working on it and protecting it in its fragility.... At times we see an obsession with denying any pre-eminence to the human person; more zeal is shown in protecting other species than in defending the dignity which all human beings share in equal measure. Certainly, we should be concerned lest other living beings be treated irresponsibly. But we should be particularly indignant at the enormous inequalities in our midst.... We fail to see that some are mired in desperate and degrading poverty, with no way out, while others have not the faintest idea of what to do with their possessions, vainly showing off their supposed superiority and leaving behind them so much waste which, if it were the case everywhere, would destroy the planet. In practice, we continue to tolerate that some consider themselves more human than others, as if they had been born with greater rights.
91. A sense of deep communion with the rest of nature cannot be real if our hearts lack tenderness, compassion and concern for our fellow human beings. It is clearly inconsistent to combat trafficking in endangered species while remaining completely indifferent to human trafficking, unconcerned about the poor, or undertaking to destroy another human being deemed unwanted....
92. Moreover, when our hearts are authentically open to universal communion, this sense of fraternity excludes nothing and no one. It follows that our indifference or cruelty towards fellow creatures of this world sooner or later affects the treatment we mete out to other human beings. We have only one heart, and the same wretchedness which leads us to mistreat an animal will not be long in showing itself in our relationships with other people....
VI. THE COMMON DESTINATION OF GOODS
93. Whether believers or not, we are agreed today that the earth is essentially a shared inheritance, whose fruits are meant to benefit everyone. For believers, this becomes a question of fidelity to the Creator, since God created the world for everyone.... The principle of the subordination of private property to the universal destination of goods, and thus the right of everyone to their use, is a golden rule of social conduct and "the first principle of the whole ethical and social order".[71] The Christian tradition has never recognized the right to private property as absolute or inviolable, and has stressed the social purpose of all forms of private property. Saint John Paul II forcefully reaffirmed this teaching, stating that "God gave the earth to the whole human race for the sustenance of all its members, without excluding or favouring anyone".[72] These are strong words. He noted that "a type of development which did not respect and promote human rights - personal and social, economic and political, including the rights of nations and of peoples - would not be really worthy of man".[73]...
94. The rich and the poor have equal dignity, for "the Lord is the maker of them all" (Prov 22:2).... This has practical consequences, such as those pointed out by the bishops of Paraguay: "Every campesino has a natural right to possess a reasonable allotment of land where he can establish his home, work for subsistence of his family and a secure life. This right must be guaranteed so that its exercise is not illusory but real. That means that apart from the ownership of property, rural people must have access to means of technical education, credit, insurance, and markets".[77]
95. ...If we make something our own, it is only to administer it for the good of all. If we do not, we burden our consciences with the weight of having denied the existence of others. That is why the New Zealand bishops asked what the commandment "Thou shall not kill" means when "twenty percent of the world's population consumes resources at a rate that robs the poor nations and future generations of what they need to survive".[78]
NOTES
[71] JOHN PAUL II, Encyclical Letter Laborem Exercens (14 September 1981), 19.
[72] Encyclical Letter Centesimus Annus (1 May 1991), 31.
[73] Encyclical Letter Sollicitudo Rei Socialis (30 December 1987), 33.
[77] PARAGUAYAN BISHOPS' CONFERENCE, Pastoral Letter El campesino paraguayo y la tierra (12 June 1983), 2, 4, d.
[78] NEW ZEALAND CATHOLIC BISHOPS CONFERENCE, Statement on Environmental Issues (1 September 2006).
Monday, September 14, 2015
"We have forgotten that man does not create himself": Laudato Si', 1-6
When Pope Francis's encyclical letter Laudato Si' came out, I was a bit befuddled by the media coverage, which claimed that the pope had suddenly become an environmentalist, and also wrote about the poor, with a sprinkling of traditional Catholic condemnations of things like artificial birth control. Frankly, it sounded like a pretty schizophrenic document (which, in any case, I didn't have time to read).
But I was again reminded of Laudato Si' when I came across a Financial Times article about Yellowstone that asked, "Are humans part of nature, or above it? Why do we care about setting aside 'wild' lands such as Yellowstone? Why do we care about the survival of wolves in the first place? Does nature and wildlife have intrinsic value?" So I picked up the document and was pleased to discover both insight and coherence.
I've excerpted some passages and will be sharing them a few times a week. Below is the first installment, in which Francis traces some of the origins of his thinking in the work of his predecessors (and implicitly argues that, although the emphasis may be new, the Church's concern for the environment is not).
1. “LAUDATO SI’, mi’ Signore” – “Praise be to you, my
Lord”. In the words of this beautiful canticle, Saint Francis of Assisi reminds
us that our common home is like a sister with whom we share our life and a
beautiful mother who opens her arms to embrace us.[1]…
2. This sister now cries out to us because of the harm we
have inflicted on her by our irresponsible use and abuse of the goods with which
God has endowed her. We have come to see ourselves as her lords and masters,
entitled to plunder her at will. The violence present in our hearts, wounded by
sin, is also reflected in the symptoms of sickness evident in the soil, in the
water, in the air and in all forms of life. This is why the earth herself,
burdened and laid waste... “groans in travail” (Rom 8:22). We have forgotten
that we ourselves are dust of the earth (cf. Gen 2:7)….
Nothing in this world is indifferent to us
3. …Faced as we are with global environmental
deterioration, I wish to address every person living on this planet…. I would like to enter into dialogue with all
people about our common home.
4. In 1971,… Blessed Pope Paul VI referred to the
ecological concern as “a tragic consequence” of unchecked human activity: “Due
to an ill-considered exploitation of nature, humanity runs the risk of
destroying it and becoming in turn a victim of this degradation”.[2] He...
stressed “the urgent need for a radical change in the conduct of humanity”,
inasmuch as “the most extraordinary scientific advances, the most amazing
technical abilities, the most astonishing economic growth, unless they are
accompanied by authentic social and moral progress, will definitively turn
against man”.[3]
5. Saint John Paul II became increasingly concerned about
this issue. In his first Encyclical he warned that human beings frequently seem
“to see no other meaning in their natural environment than what serves for
immediate use and consumption”.[4]… At
the same time, he noted that little effort had been made to “safeguard the
moral conditions for an authentic human ecology”.[6] The destruction of the
human environment is extremely serious, not only because God has entrusted the
world to us men and women, but because human life is itself a gift which must
be defended from various forms of debasement. Every effort to protect and
improve our world entails profound changes in “lifestyles, models of production
and consumption, and the established structures of power which today govern
societies”.[7] Authentic human development has a moral character. It presumes
full respect for the human person, but it must also be concerned for the world
around us and “take into account the nature of each being and of its mutual connection
in an ordered system”.[8]…
6. My predecessor Benedict XVI likewise proposed
“eliminating the structural causes of the dysfunctions of the world economy and
correcting models of growth which have proved incapable of ensuring respect for
the environment”.[10] He observed that the world cannot be analyzed by
isolating only one of its aspects, since “the book of nature is one and
indivisible”, and includes the environment, life, sexuality, the family, social
relations, and so forth. It follows that “the deterioration of nature is
closely connected to the culture which shapes human coexistence”.[11] Pope
Benedict asked us to recognize that the natural environment has been gravely
damaged by our irresponsible behaviour. The social environment has also suffered
damage. Both are ultimately due to the same evil: the notion that there are no
indisputable truths to guide our lives, and hence human freedom is limitless.
We have forgotten that “…man does not create himself…”.[12] With paternal
concern, Benedict urged us to realize that creation is harmed “where we
ourselves have the final word, where everything is simply our property and we
use it for ourselves alone. The misuse of creation begins when we no longer
recognize any higher instance than ourselves…”.[13]
NOTES
[1] Canticle of the Creatures, in Francis of Assisi:
Early Documents, vol. 1, New York / London /Manila, 1999, 113-114.
[2] Apostolic Letter Octogesima Adveniens (14 May 1971),
21.
[3] Address to FAO on the 25th Anniversary of its
Institution (16 November 1970), 4.
[4] Encyclical Letter Redemptor Hominis (4 March 1979),
15.
[6] Encyclical Letter Centesimus Annus (1 May 1991), 38.
[7] Ibid., 58.
[8] Encyclical Letter Sollicitudo Rei Socialis (30
December 1987), 34.
[10] Address to the Diplomatic Corps Accredited to the
Holy See (8 January 2007).
[11] Encyclical Letter Caritas in Veritate (29 June
2009), 51.
[12] Address to the Bundestag, Berlin (22 September
2011).
[13] Address to the Clergy of the Diocese of
Bolzano-Bressanone (6 August 2008).
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)